pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#91,977,013
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #91,977,013
23 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-07-31 17:35:18 UTC
Parallelism
65
/100
Blocked
63
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.26
Longest chain
8
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#91,977,013
· 23 txs across 8 waves · depth 8
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#6
execPerpOps
#7
execPerpOps
#11
0x3f5c179b
#14
0x94defb17
· blocks 1
#15
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#17
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#18
setData
#20
execOrders
#21
0x59558d29
· blocks 1
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#16
0x8b80a919
#22
0x59558d29
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#8
0x5a5d9a99
· blocks 3
#10
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#9
0x5a5d9a99
· blocks 1
#12
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#13
execFwdPositionOps
#19
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w4
8
w5
9
w6
10
w5
12
w6
13
w7
19
w7
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x6fe7d366…78ff
0x34b655…2a6f
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x07d4a92a…6088
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x64e1f0ce…7158
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
15 conflicts on slot
0x6fe7d366be…a578ff
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity