pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#91,983,797
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #91,983,797
26 transactions · 24 stateful · 2026-07-31 18:09:26 UTC
Parallelism
77
/100
Blocked
38
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.69
Longest chain
6
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#91,983,797
· 26 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#5
0x6a6ce54d
#6
updatePrices
#7
execOrders
#8
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 4
#9
execFwdPositionOps
#10
executeBatch
#11
0x3f5c179b
#12
0x3f5c179b
· blocks 1
#15
0x57368ddf
#16
forward
#17
execOrders
#18
execOrders
· blocks 1
#20
setData
#24
0x59558d29
#25
0xc7e3ec2c
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#14
0xed82b078
#19
execOrders
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#4
0x0c7abd22
#13
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#21
execOrders
· blocks 2
#22
execOrders
· blocks 1
#23
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
8
w0
12
w0
13
w3
14
w1
18
w0
19
w1
21
w3
22
w4
23
w5
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x485d2778…aa5c
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x9c3d271e…75b0
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity