← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #92,001,436
15 transactions · 14 stateful · 2026-07-31 19:38:09 UTC
Parallelism
67/100
Blocked
50%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.8
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #92,001,436 · 15 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w05w17w28w211w012w313w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…002a
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x3af0dd8e…0023
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x22e0cc1d…ad0d
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity