pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#92,015,424
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #92,015,424
9 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-07-31 20:48:29 UTC
Parallelism
78
/100
Blocked
13
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.11
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#92,015,424
· 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x5a5d9a99
· blocks 1
#2
execFwdPositionOps
#3
executeBatch
#5
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#6
setData
#7
execOrders
#8
0x59558d29
#4
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
4
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xa20a130c…5d59
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe5bb3628…e5f1
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x05d353a8…5168
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x20fbcaee…bb79
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2d94ecd9…43db
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3c0c2f32…c3df
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x4a5956ef…e226
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xa20a130ca6…b85d59
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity