← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #92,590,456
14 transactions · 12 stateful · 2026-08-02 21:00:30 UTC
Parallelism
50/100
Blocked
50%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.79
Longest chain
7 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #92,590,456 · 14 txs across 7 waves · depth 7
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
wave w6
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w03w04w15w27w39w410w512w6
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xdbc6e634…e16b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002e
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x0b5029ee…9e26
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity