pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#92,600,361
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #92,600,361
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-08-02 21:50:20 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
10
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#92,600,361
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x5acec890
#2
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#3
execOrders
· blocks 1
#5
0x316ba5f2
#6
0x6a6fbc13
#7
setData
#8
execOrders
#9
0x59558d29
#4
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3
w0
4
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x737acb78…fce8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x66d5e476…8a1f
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x6a62629d…5e33
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xce06a0f7…efef
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xac2a0273…721b
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xbde524f4…43bf
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x5c1e4658…3669
0x34b655…2a6f
3 touches
1 conflict
0x2d94ecd9…43db
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x737acb7813…fafce8
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity