pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#92,973,768
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #92,973,768
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-08-04 05:10:04 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
10
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#92,973,768
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
withdraw
#2
execFwdPositionOps
#3
execOrders
#4
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#6
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#7
0x6a7174a3
#8
setData
#9
0xc7e3ec2c
#5
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4
w0
5
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xb39cb1d8…effa
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x085df2c1…305a
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2ad29b13…92e0
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x34a1ee7e…fb20
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x423e986e…1f6f
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x47ee9f76…8dee
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xb39cb1d8c6…28effa
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity