pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#93,177,011
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #93,177,011
8 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-08-04 22:13:43 UTC
Parallelism
75
/100
Blocked
14
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.13
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#93,177,011
· 8 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
execOrders
#2
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#3
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
setData
#6
0x59558d29
#7
0xc7e3ec2c
#4
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
4
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x66bdb4c2…7ea6
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaf19c45c…d1a8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaf19c45c…d1a9
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x039f1f6c…3155
0x34b655…2a6f
3 touches
1 conflict
0x684aa88f…04c8
0x34b655…2a6f
3 touches
1 conflict
0x1b244606…3f84
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x203d3aec…f72c
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x334aa47d…cac0
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x66bdb4c268…a97ea6
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity