pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#93,387,841
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #93,387,841
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-08-05 15:53:44 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
22
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.2
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#93,387,841
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
execOrder
· blocks 1
#3
0x5acec890
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
0x6a735cff
#6
setData
#7
execOrders
· blocks 1
#9
0x59558d29
#2
execOrder
#8
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
7
w0
8
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe999cbf5…d18a
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xebb79669…793d
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd66696e0…0842
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x74fd0a9b…3aaa
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x9475931e…4e88
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x948836ff…59ab
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xc824469a90…af6425
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity