pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#93,855,311
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #93,855,311
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-08-07 07:03:48 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
11
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#93,855,311
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
#2
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#3
0x39435dac
#4
0x39435dac
#5
0x0f6795d9
· blocks 1
#7
execTransaction
#8
transfer
#9
setData
#6
0x0f6795d9
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
5
w0
6
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x159cff26…7665
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x482471ad…122f
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc824469a…6426
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x623cfe6a…ed4c
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd7908b5f…56b9
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x1b1451d3…e1f4
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x46870010…0b51
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xbde524f4…43bf
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x159cff262c…e57665
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity