pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#94,201,003
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #94,201,003
10 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-08-08 12:06:08 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
13
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#94,201,003
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
execOrders
#2
execOrders
#3
updatePrices
#4
execOrders
· blocks 1
#5
0x3f5c179b
#6
execFwdPositionOps
#8
0x6a771c28
#9
execOrders
#7
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4
w0
7
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xf324b405…ca30
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x05e06fe8…d36b
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x6676e87f…b88f
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xdaf4f143…58d4
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x22e0cc1d…ad0d
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x326a02b5…8dad
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x46822f8c…d048
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xf324b40549…56ca30
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity