pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#94,686,084
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #94,686,084
11 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-08-10 04:58:32 UTC
Parallelism
82
/100
Blocked
11
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.09
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#94,686,084
· 11 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
#2
execOrders
· blocks 1
#4
updatePrices
#5
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#6
execFwdPositionOps
#7
execOrders
#8
execFwdPositionOps
#9
0x6a795af0
#10
setData
#3
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
3
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x10e77cb1…d08b
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xbde524f4…43bf
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xea02471d…1542
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf3d10975…0d07
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x4bc1abab…5874
0x34b655…2a6f
3 touches
1 conflict
0xcdb40908…3ccd
0x34b655…2a6f
3 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x10e77cb165…2bd08b
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity