pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#94,741,365
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #94,741,365
8 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-08-10 09:37:11 UTC
Parallelism
75
/100
Blocked
25
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.25
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#94,741,365
· 8 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
execOrders
· blocks 1
#3
0x3f5c179b
#4
execFwdPositionOps
· blocks 1
#5
0x30a19e01
#7
setData
#2
execOrder
#6
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
4
w0
6
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x93b6fab0…09d6
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7e5ea60a…c4aa
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x1321736a…43e3
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x92385428…6941
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x44e17c01…59a2
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x482471ad…122f
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x5a0a2b03…ac50
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x93b6fab01a…2d09d6
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity