pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#94,839,650
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #94,839,650
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-08-10 17:52:28 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
10
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#94,839,650
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
execOrders
#2
0x5acec890
#3
0x5acec890
· blocks 1
#4
settlePredictions
#5
redeemDelegations
#6
execFwdPositionOps
#8
approve
#9
setData
#7
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3
w0
7
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xe5bb3628…e5f1
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x1637d9f2…a9e5
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd93edb3f…94ec
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00210867…83b6
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2b5101ac…090b
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x4bc1abab…5874
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x53b4ef2b…8a05
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x76e2c80e…1811
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xe5bb3628b5…71e5f1
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity