pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#94,905,437
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #94,905,437
25 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-08-10 23:23:22 UTC
Parallelism
68
/100
Blocked
35
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.12
Longest chain
8
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#94,905,437
· 25 txs across 8 waves · depth 8
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 7
#6
0xa96df62f
#7
0x1094dc9f
#10
execPerpOps
#11
execPerpOps
#12
0xbb1740dd
#14
execFwdPositionOps
#15
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#16
0x57368ddf
#17
execFwdPositionOps
#18
execOrders
#19
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#20
0x6a7a5de1
#21
setData
#22
0x0acd6c…2424
#23
0x693298…ca6b
#24
0x59558d29
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#8
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#9
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#13
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w4
8
w5
9
w6
13
w7
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x16183223…343c
0xd32edf…ff58
15 touches
28 conflicts
0x09000000…0007
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x74f4fb74…6f3a
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x01e7b865…6e6d
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x01e7b865…6e6e
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
FastLane: FastLaneAuctionHandler
28 conflicts on slot
0x16183223f0…83343c
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity