pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#95,154,346
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #95,154,346
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-08-11 20:16:11 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
22
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.2
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#95,154,346
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
execOrders
· blocks 2
#3
0x5acec890
#4
0x5acec890
#5
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#6
execFwdPositionOps
#7
relay
#9
setData
#2
execOrders
#8
execFwdPositionOps
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
8
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xbde524f4…43bf
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x0ddfdaf2…9e00
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x217bd767…b79e
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x31ef4e0d…2944
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3c0e49c9…7833
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x4bc1abab…5874
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0xc824469a90…af6425
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity