pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#96,119,848
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #96,119,848
9 transactions · 6 stateful · 2026-08-15 05:27:32 UTC
Parallelism
78
/100
Blocked
17
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.11
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#96,119,848
· 9 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
setPriceForArbitrum
#2
setPrice
#3
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#4
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#5
claim
· blocks 1
#7
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#8
setData
#6
0xc925b3a5
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
5
w0
6
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0006
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0x66cc2b88…daca
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0x521a5982…a82a
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
0x66cc2b88…dacb
0x968279…9342
3 touches
1 conflict
0x87d62b39…b5ab
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xb0730197…0636
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xb0730197…0637
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xbcbf5d09…8bac
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x96827978…f09342
1 conflict on slot
0x0000000000…000006
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity