← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #96,489,070
13 transactions · 12 stateful · 2026-08-16 12:24:38 UTC
Parallelism
85/100
Blocked
17%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.15
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #96,489,070 · 13 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
5w08w09w110w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xe504ee67…1ddb
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe0bd8e39…1218
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe0bd8e39…1219
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe0bd8e39…121c
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe0bd8e39…121d
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe0bd8e39…121f
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe504ee67…1dd8
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe504ee67…1dd9
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: 0x96827978…f09342
1 conflict on slot 0xe504ee671e…781ddb
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity