← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #96,536,330
16 transactions · 15 stateful · 2026-08-16 16:22:37 UTC
Parallelism
88/100
Blocked
27%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.25
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #96,536,330 · 16 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w17w08w19w010w111w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xe624d0c7…5299
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcb9a4488…1493
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcb9a4488…1495
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe624d0c7…5292
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe624d0c7…5293
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe624d0c7…5296
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0xe624d0c7…5297
0x968279…9342
4 touches
1 conflict
0x08636046…e60f
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: 0x96827978…f09342
1 conflict on slot 0xe624d0c79a…985299
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity