pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#97,496,874
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #97,496,874
23 transactions · 22 stateful · 2026-08-20 01:39:26 UTC
Parallelism
74
/100
Blocked
41
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.57
Longest chain
6
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#97,496,874
· 23 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#5
0x7b84f330
· blocks 1
#6
matchOrders
#7
0xab083028
#8
execOrders
#9
execOrder
#10
execOrder
· blocks 1
#11
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#12
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#15
0x3f5c179b
#17
proposeResolution
#18
setData
#19
0x59558d29
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#13
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#16
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#22
0x7b84f330
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#14
0x3f5c179b
#20
execOrders
· blocks 1
#21
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w0
10
w0
12
w0
13
w1
14
w3
16
w1
20
w4
21
w5
22
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd0ec60a1…d240
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x8195ad1e…c578
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity