pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#98,072,119
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #98,072,119
24 transactions · 22 stateful · 2026-08-22 02:21:06 UTC
Parallelism
83
/100
Blocked
50
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.63
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#98,072,119
· 24 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#5
0x7b84f330
#6
0x7b84f330
· blocks 1
#7
0x59558d29
· blocks 1
#9
execPerpOps
· blocks 1
#10
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#12
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#14
0x3f5c179b
· blocks 1
#15
0x57368ddf
#16
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#19
setData
· blocks 1
#22
0x7b84f330
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#8
0x59558d29
#11
execPerpOps
#17
0xed82b078
· blocks 1
#20
setData
#21
execOrders
#23
0x7b84f330
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#13
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#18
0xed82b078
#4
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
6
w0
7
w0
8
w1
9
w0
11
w1
12
w0
13
w2
14
w0
17
w1
18
w2
19
w0
20
w1
21
w1
23
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…001c
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002c
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x485d2778…aa5e
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x17e43adc…4e03
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…00001c
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity