← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #98,415,846
22 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-08-23 07:11:10 UTC
Parallelism
91/100
Blocked
20%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.18
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #98,415,846 · 22 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3w04w17w010w011w113w120w021w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd9f1e40f…09a3
0x3bd359…433a
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x15698ac9…2a46
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x527f20e3…82e7
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7de57974…f5ba
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc6bd6a80…bd3c
0x34b655…2a6f
3 touches
1 conflict
0x256f50e0…1e90
0x065c9d…c394
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x889d5e90…929a
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: Wrapped MON (WMON)
1 conflict on slot 0xd9f1e40f03…3209a3
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity