← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #98,428,539
61 transactions · 56 stateful · 2026-08-23 08:15:01 UTC
Parallelism
92/100
Blocked
11%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.15
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #98,428,539 · 61 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w08w19w210w011w117w357w458w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…002b
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x083a8763…5a7b
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x889d5e90…929a
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity