pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#98,428,623
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #98,428,623
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-08-23 08:15:27 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
10
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#98,428,623
· 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
#2
execOrder
· blocks 1
#3
0x59558d29
#4
0x928e4afa
#6
executeBatch
#7
finalizeOutcome
#8
0x6a8aac97
#9
setData
#5
execFwdPositionOpsV2
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
5
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x9fc19296…1077
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc16f6da7…5399
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x889d5e90…929a
0x2a68ba…90c5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x02690385…0928
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x08d66073…e706
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x167de262…f61f
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x24b08f9c…e594
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
1 conflict on slot
0x9fc1929647…8c1077
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity