← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #98,526,459
28 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-08-23 16:33:20 UTC
Parallelism
82/100
Blocked
40%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.5
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #98,526,459 · 28 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w37w08w111w012w117w021w426w127w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…002d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x6c6f37ba…c20a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x1ffd3572…6639
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00002d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity