← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #98,562,858
20 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-08-23 19:43:03 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
37%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.7
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #98,562,858 · 20 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w15w06w27w08w111w112w213w316w019w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002e
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x580c6fe7…0fe8
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xaa429e9e…f559
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity