← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #98,741,854
28 transactions · 22 stateful · 2026-08-24 11:07:33 UTC
Parallelism
82/100
Blocked
32%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.36
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #98,741,854 · 28 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w04w15w27w08w315w016w120w421w122w023w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x0a85a226…83bb
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0029
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0019
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity