← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #98,851,068
30 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-08-24 20:17:21 UTC
Parallelism
87/100
Blocked
39%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.47
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #98,851,068 · 30 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w06w07w18w211w112w213w019w220w324w128w129w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x11998eac…f9a2
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x19ff2978…43f2
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity