pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#98,990,338
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #98,990,338
25 transactions · 22 stateful · 2026-08-25 07:58:01 UTC
Parallelism
76
/100
Blocked
45
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.68
Longest chain
6
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#98,990,338
· 25 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#6
execOrders
#9
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#10
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#11
execOrders
#12
0x59558d29
#13
execPerpOps
#14
execPerpOps
#16
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#17
0x3f5c179b
#19
forward
#20
0xed82b078
#22
forceVoid
#23
setData
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#4
execute_route
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#5
0xab083028
· blocks 1
#7
0x0c7abd22
#8
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#21
0xed82b078
#15
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#18
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#24
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w1
5
w2
7
w3
8
w3
15
w4
16
w0
18
w5
21
w3
24
w5
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xe897738b…1e0d
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…002e
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x511f46a7…edae
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
FastLane: FastLaneAuctionHandler
6 conflicts on slot
0xe897738bd4…921e0d
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity