← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #99,156,835
17 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-08-25 22:02:25 UTC
Parallelism
71/100
Blocked
38%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.59
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #99,156,835 · 17 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w15w06w07w211w312w113w216w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xfac61869…a55d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xe1c4e5ce…0dec
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x4c29ecd5…58b6
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x11258774…9892
0x2a68ba…90c5
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0xfac61869bf…30a55d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity