pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#99,243,682
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #99,243,682
21 transactions · 21 stateful · 2026-08-26 05:19:22 UTC
Parallelism
62
/100
Blocked
62
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.14
Longest chain
8
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#99,243,682
· 21 txs across 8 waves · depth 8
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#5
updatePrices
#11
setData
#14
0x3f5c179b
#15
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#16
0x57368ddf
#19
0x6a8e77d1
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#6
0xab083028
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#7
execOrders
· blocks 3
#10
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#4
0x0c7abd22
#8
execOrders
· blocks 2
#12
execOrder
· blocks 2
#9
execOrders
· blocks 1
#13
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#17
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#18
execOrders
#20
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
6
w1
7
w2
8
w3
9
w4
10
w2
12
w3
13
w5
17
w6
18
w7
20
w7
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xfa324e43…8897
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xe8411757…f98d
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity