pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#99,320,958
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #99,320,958
25 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-08-26 11:48:10 UTC
Parallelism
68
/100
Blocked
57
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.84
Longest chain
8
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#99,320,958
· 25 txs across 8 waves · depth 8
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#5
0x41a8f47c
#6
setData
#7
updatePrices
#9
0xab083028
#10
execOrders
#12
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#13
0x6a8ed2f1
#14
forward
#16
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#17
0x3f5c179b
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#20
0xed82b078
#21
harvest
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#8
0xab083028
#11
0x5acec890
#15
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 3
#18
redeemDelegations
· blocks 1
#22
execOrders
· blocks 2
#19
redeemDelegations
#23
execOrders
· blocks 1
#24
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
8
w3
11
w4
15
w4
18
w5
19
w6
20
w1
21
w1
22
w5
23
w6
24
w7
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xc13fac9b…d2d3
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x93a0011a…3be2
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0xd9f18d9a4a…7f141d
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity