pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#99,356,176
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #99,356,176
25 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-08-26 14:45:25 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
53
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.84
Longest chain
5
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#99,356,176
· 25 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#6
execOrders
#8
0xab083028
#9
0x8263f5d9
#10
0x59558d29
#11
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#12
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#13
0x3f5c179b
#16
forward
#17
0x6a8efc7c
#18
setData
#19
bridge
#21
execOrders
#22
execOrders
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#14
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 3
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#20
execOrders
· blocks 2
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#7
0x6ad2e98b
#15
0xed82b078
#23
execOrders
· blocks 1
#5
0x0c7abd22
#24
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w4
7
w3
11
w0
12
w0
14
w1
15
w3
20
w2
23
w3
24
w4
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x6fb764a5…7a2b
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002e
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xe483d4e3…e531
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
FastLane: FastLaneAuctionHandler
10 conflicts on slot
0x6fb764a509…2f7a2b
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity