pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#99,357,424
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #99,357,424
28 transactions · 25 stateful · 2026-08-26 14:51:41 UTC
Parallelism
86
/100
Blocked
44
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.46
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#99,357,424
· 28 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#4
0x6a8efdf5
· blocks 1
#7
updatePrices
· blocks 1
#8
updatePrices
#11
0x5acec890
#12
0x928e4afa
#13
0x6a8efdf5
#14
execOrder
#15
execOrder
· blocks 1
#16
0x59558d29
#17
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#18
0x3f5c179b
#21
0xed82b078
#22
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#23
0xf5d05576
#25
setData
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#6
0x6a8efdf5
#9
updatePrices
#10
0x5acec890
· blocks 1
#24
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#3
0x0c7abd22
#5
0xab083028
· blocks 1
#19
0x3f5c179b
#26
execOrders
· blocks 1
#20
0x3f5c179b
#27
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w0
5
w2
6
w1
7
w0
9
w1
10
w1
15
w0
19
w2
20
w3
24
w1
26
w2
27
w3
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…002e
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x9b334941…fde0
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x0ea4934e…f73a
0xd32edf…ff58
5 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…00001e
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity