pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#99,448,146
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #99,448,146
26 transactions · 25 stateful · 2026-08-26 22:28:38 UTC
Parallelism
73
/100
Blocked
40
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.73
Longest chain
7
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#99,448,146
· 26 txs across 7 waves · depth 7
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#5
execOrders
· blocks 1
#8
0x5acec890
#9
0x59558d29
#10
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#13
0xd708c5d8
#14
0x6a8f690e
#15
setData
#16
execOrders
· blocks 1
#18
execOrders
#19
execOrders
#20
execOrders
#21
execOrders
#22
execOrders
#23
execOrders
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#6
execOrders
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#11
0x3f5c179b
#7
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#12
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#17
execOrders
· blocks 1
#25
execOrders
#24
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w0
6
w1
7
w4
10
w0
11
w3
12
w4
16
w0
17
w5
24
w6
25
w5
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x784d7a94…94a2
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x94c1e8b3…3238
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity