pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#99,448,913
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #99,448,913
25 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-08-26 22:32:30 UTC
Parallelism
76
/100
Blocked
48
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.76
Longest chain
6
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#99,448,913
· 25 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#5
execOrders
#10
0x5acec890
#12
0x59558d29
#13
execPerpOps
#14
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#15
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#17
0x3f5c179b
#18
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#19
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#20
0xed82b078
#21
0xed82b078
#22
setData
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#7
0x32d01e04
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#6
0x6ad2e98b
#16
0x3f5c179b
#4
0x0c7abd22
#8
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#11
execOrder
· blocks 1
#9
0x5acec890
#23
execOrders
· blocks 1
#24
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
6
w2
7
w1
8
w3
9
w4
11
w3
16
w2
19
w0
23
w4
24
w5
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x35801c67…bcc5
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x8181bd65…cf50
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…000013
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity