← previous blocknext block →recent activity

Analyzing

Block #99,659,837

21 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-08-27 16:21:29 UTC

Parallelism

62/100

Blocked

50%

Avg conflicts / tx

1.14

Longest chain

8 deep

Execution timeline

did this block parallelize well?

view

block #99,659,837  ·  21 txs across 8 waves  ·  depth 8
parallel ↔ serial

wave w0

wave w1

wave w2

wave w3

wave w4

wave w5

wave w6

wave w7

parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others

Conflict graph

Blocked by

- write/write- - read/write

x = tx position · y = wave (depth)

Hot storage slots

Contention

0x00000000…0012

0x1b6862…e19c

10 touches
10 conflicts

0x00000000…0013

0x1b6862…e19c

10 touches
10 conflicts

0x00000000…0015

0x1b6862…e19c

10 touches
10 conflicts

0x00000000…001c

0x1b6862…e19c

10 touches
10 conflicts

0x00000000…002c

0x1b6862…e19c

10 touches
10 conflicts

0x083a8763…5a7c

0x1b6862…e19c

10 touches
10 conflicts

0xd9f18d9a…141d

0x1b6862…e19c

10 touches
10 conflicts

0x672fdfbb…2209

0xd32edf…ff58

9 touches
10 conflicts

What's blocking what?

Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.

The bottleneck

Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)

10 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012

← previous block·next block →recent activity