pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#99,873,052
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #99,873,052
22 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-08-28 10:20:43 UTC
Parallelism
82
/100
Blocked
32
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.45
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#99,873,052
· 22 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
#2
0x0c7abd22
#3
0x6a916173
· blocks 1
#5
0x6a916173
#6
updatePrices
· blocks 3
#10
0x5acec890
#11
0x59558d29
#12
execPerpOps
#13
execPerpOps
#14
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#15
executeBatch
#16
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#17
transferWithAuthorization
· blocks 2
#20
setData
#21
execOrders
#4
0x6a916173
#7
updatePrices
· blocks 2
#18
transferWithAuthorization
· blocks 1
#8
updatePrices
· blocks 1
#19
transferWithAuthorization
#9
updatePrices
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3
w0
4
w1
6
w0
7
w1
8
w2
9
w3
17
w0
18
w1
19
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0002
0xf5b5f7…6d70
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd17580f9…ece1
0x754704…b603
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x0d622e34…0000
0x681e90…ae09
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0xf5b5f7f8…a36d70
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…000002
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity