← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #99,879,037
17 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-08-28 10:50:51 UTC
Parallelism
76/100
Blocked
56%
Avg conflicts / tx
1
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #99,879,037 · 17 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w36w27w08w112w114w215w116w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xc6a8c250…7379
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x5ce0b66c…fb9c
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity