pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#99,992,220
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #99,992,220
28 transactions · 22 stateful · 2026-08-28 20:21:13 UTC
Parallelism
86
/100
Blocked
32
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.5
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#99,992,220
· 28 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#4
0xa96df62f
#5
execOrders
· blocks 2
#7
0x6ad2e98b
#8
0x59558d29
#9
0xb414539a
#10
execOrders
#12
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#13
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#15
0xed82b078
#16
0xed82b078
#17
0x6a91ee30
#18
setData
#20
execOrders
#21
execOrders
#22
execOrders
#23
execOrders
#24
execOrders
#25
execOrders
#26
execOrders
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#6
execOrders
#14
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#19
execOrders
· blocks 1
#11
0x0c7abd22
#27
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
5
w0
6
w1
11
w3
13
w0
14
w1
19
w2
27
w3
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd996735f…8730
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xab708853…ad4d
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…002a
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…000013
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity